PG&E Pipeline Safety

Public Advocate Office's (the Office) Motion for CPUC Rule 1 Violation





On December 16, 2015, the Public Advocates Office (the Office) filed a Motion with the CPUC requesting that PG&E show cause as to why it should not be sanctioned for intentional misrepresentations of its compliance with gas safety regulations. The Public Advocates Office (the Office) asserts that PG&E should also be sanctioned for failure to have a comprehensive gas pipeline "test and replace" plan in place, as required by state law.


See the Office's December 16, 2015 Motion.


In D.16-06-056, the CPUC denied the Office's motion for an Order to Show Cause.    



On December 30, 2015, PG&E issued a Response to the Office's Motion.

PG&E's December 30, 2015 Compliance Letter to the CPUC:  Response to Safety and Enforcement Division Directive to Correct PG&E’s Annual Reports

See the Office's January 11, 2016 Reply to PG&E's Response to the Office's Motion.  




See the Proceeding docket.  



PG&E PHMSA 2014 7100 Report Update to Parts Q & R